Stop repeating the same NEET mistakes. Start repairing them — 10 minutes at a time.

Coaching tells you “you’re weak in Kinematics.” That doesn’t help — Kinematics has 14 sub-concepts, and you’re probably strong in 12 of them. The Concept X-Ray tells you instead:

You’re not weak in Kinematics. You’re weak in sign convention on inclined planes, and you confuse relative velocity with average velocity in 1D problems. Two specific traps. Five focused practice questions to repair.

Why we can do this. We’ve catalogued 119 specific NEET traps across all 8 official trap categories — sign convention, unit conversion, graph interpretation, similar terms (heavy in Biology taxonomy), overthinking, negative-marking risk, organic-reaction conditions, inorganic exceptions. Every trap is backed by previous-year-paper evidence. Every trap links to the formulas, mistakes, and PYQ patterns it exploits. The corpus also tracks 3 official 2026 NEET bulletin errata at the syllabus-node level — so when NTA quietly updates the wording on a question (it happens), our system reflects the official truth, not stale coaching content.

Proof you can verify. Our Mechanics-foundation corpus has 27 fully-validated topic dossiers. Each one carries syllabus reference, NCERT page citation, formula list, common mistake catalogue, and PYQ trap evidence — provenance you can trace back to the exact source document.

Most platforms explain why the right answer is right. We explain why each wrong answer was tempting, and exactly which mistake-type made it tempting.

Question 47 — Atwood pulley with two unequal masses.

You chose option 2. Tempting because the formula matches if you forget the tension on the lighter mass adds to its weight, not subtracts. That’s a sign-convention error. It happens because you set both ropes pulling “up” without picking a positive direction.

The fix: pick a positive direction first, mark every force’s sign relative to it, then write the equations. Try Question 48 — same trap, different surface.

Why we can do this. Our PYQ pattern catalogue stores the common-distractor-types for each question shape. Every distractor links to its mistake-type, its trap, and the misconception that drives it. The teaching is structural, not improvised.

Why it works. Learning-science research (Smith 2018, Lecturio retrieval-practice review) confirms: students who study why each wrong option was wrong outperform students who only study the right answer — even on tests they’ve never seen before.

Take a coaching mock test, get your score, see “weak in Chemistry,” move on. Next week, same mistake. Coaching’s analysis-after-test is one-shot.

The Mistake Clinic is different: when you make a mistake, we don’t just note it — we schedule it. Same-day quick recall. Next-day quick recall. 3-day. 7-day. Mixed-topic test.

A mistake stays in your queue until you’ve defeated the same trap on five different surfaces. Only then does the system mark that sub-concept Mastered.

Why we can do this. Our 15-mistake catalogue links each mistake to its trap, its formula, and a curated list of next-practice questions. Every mistake has a “what to study, in what order, with what to test on” mapping. Backed by spaced-repetition + active-recall evidence — the same techniques that put Anki users at the top of USMLE Step 1 scores.